Difference between revisions of "Offline Analysis Commissioning"
From Hall D Ops Wiki
(→What we want to know) |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
** Integrating their histograms into RootSpy. | ** Integrating their histograms into RootSpy. | ||
| + | == Reconstruction Quality Monitoring == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Commissioning Tests === | ||
| + | * What is the calibration quality of each system? | ||
| + | * Can we perform reconstruction for each system? (Tracks, showers, etc.) | ||
| + | * Are there any regions of the detector where reconstruction is inefficient? | ||
| + | * Are tracks being properly matched to hits in the other detectors? | ||
| + | * What is the quality of the particle ID? | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Action Items === | ||
* Paul: Will integrate the monitoring_hists plugin (reconstruction) plots into RootSpy. | * Paul: Will integrate the monitoring_hists plugin (reconstruction) plots into RootSpy. | ||
| + | * Detector groups: | ||
| + | ** Writing the calibration scripts/programs/plugins for their systems. | ||
| + | ** Determining which plots are the primary plots and which are diagnostic plots. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Analysis Quality Monitoring == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Commissioning Tests === | ||
| + | * Can we see pi0 peaks | ||
| + | * Can we see simple final states | ||
| + | ** γ p → p π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> | ||
| + | ** γ p → p π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup> | ||
| + | ** γ p → p π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> η | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Data History Monitoring == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * How do the online histograms change as a function of time (e.g. hits/event vs run number)? | ||
* Is the reconstruction working? | * Is the reconstruction working? | ||
Revision as of 20:46, 22 September 2014
Contents
Introduction
This document describes the goals of the data monitoring that will be carried out during the fall 2014 commissioning run of Hall D.
Raw Data Monitoring
- These questions are for every detector system: TAGH, TAGM, CDC, FDC, SC, TOF, BCAL, FCAL, PS (Pair Spectrometer)
Commissioning Tests
- Can we read data from tape?
- Are the detectors working?
- Do all of the channels have hits?
- What are the hit counts/rates per channel?
- Are the energies & times OK, garbage, or out of range? (by channel)
Action Items
- David: Online data monitoring environment (RootSpy, hdview2, etc.)
- David is updating RootSpy and its documentation/instructions.
- When he's finished, he'll contact the different detector groups and remind them to write their online monitoring plugins.
- Detector groups:
- Writing the monitoring plugins for their systems.
- Determining which plots are the primary plots (most important for shift-takers) and which are diagnostic plots.
- Integrating their histograms into RootSpy.
Reconstruction Quality Monitoring
Commissioning Tests
- What is the calibration quality of each system?
- Can we perform reconstruction for each system? (Tracks, showers, etc.)
- Are there any regions of the detector where reconstruction is inefficient?
- Are tracks being properly matched to hits in the other detectors?
- What is the quality of the particle ID?
Action Items
- Paul: Will integrate the monitoring_hists plugin (reconstruction) plots into RootSpy.
- Detector groups:
- Writing the calibration scripts/programs/plugins for their systems.
- Determining which plots are the primary plots and which are diagnostic plots.
Analysis Quality Monitoring
Commissioning Tests
- Can we see pi0 peaks
- Can we see simple final states
- γ p → p π+ π-
- γ p → p π+ π- π0
- γ p → p π+ π- η
Data History Monitoring
- How do the online histograms change as a function of time (e.g. hits/event vs run number)?
- Is the reconstruction working?
- Run full reconstruction over a small % of data, view tracking/shower-reconstruction results online (hdview2, monitoring_hists plugins).
