Difference between revisions of "CPP and NPP Readiness Review"
From GlueXWiki
(→Draft Outline Presentations (Date?)) |
(→Comments to Response 3 (Approval)) |
||
(88 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Planning for Experiment == | == Planning for Experiment == | ||
− | + | * [https://www.jlab.org/physics/experiment_process/np-pfx Procedures for Experiments] | |
− | == | + | == Outline Presentations (February 10, 2021) == |
* [[Media:HallD CPP-NPP charge.pdf | Charge]] | * [[Media:HallD CPP-NPP charge.pdf | Charge]] | ||
− | * | + | * [https://bluejeans.com/195964581 https://bluejeans.com/195964581] Bluejeans connection for Open Session |
− | + | ||
− | * | + | * Reviewers: |
− | ** 08: | + | ** Stepan Stepanyan (chair+muon detector) |
− | ** 08:45-09: | + | ** Alexandre Cansonne (Trigger) |
− | ** 09: | + | ** Brad Sawatzky (Tracking System -MWPC) |
− | ** 10: | + | ** Chris Keith (Target) |
− | ** 10:45-11: | + | ** Robin Wines (Installation) |
− | ** 11: | + | ** Mikhail Kostin (RadCon) |
+ | ** Edy Nissen (Beamline) | ||
+ | ** Javier Gomez (Observer) | ||
+ | ** Ed Folts (Observer) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Agenda | ||
+ | ** 08:15-08:45 Executive session | ||
+ | ** 08:45-09:35 (30+20) [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-public/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4905 Overview of Experiment and Setup] (Charges: 1, 2. 5, 8) -- Rory Miskimen | ||
+ | ** 09:35-10:25 (30+20) [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-public/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4903 Engineering Design, Fabrication, Operation and Installation of CPP Hardware] (Charges: 2, 3, 4) -- Tim Whitlatch | ||
+ | ** 10:25-10:45 Coffee break | ||
+ | ** 10:45-11:15 (20+10) [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-public/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4898 Project implementation, resources and schedule] (Charges: 3, 6, 7, 9) -- Elton Smith | ||
+ | ** 11:15-14:30 Lunch and Executive Session | ||
** 14:30 Closeout | ** 14:30 Closeout | ||
− | * ERR Final Report | + | == Report and Response== |
− | * | + | |
+ | === Report === | ||
+ | * [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4969 ERR Final Report, Feb 23, 2021] | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Response 1 === | ||
+ | * [https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0050/005079/002/HallD_CPP_NPP_ERR_v4_response.pdf Point-by-point Response] | ||
+ | * [https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0050/005079/002/Coarse_schedule.pdf Timelines and Responsibilities] | ||
+ | * [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-public/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5080 Fabrication and Performance of the MWPC] GlueX-doc-5080 | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Comments to Response 1 === | ||
+ | * [[Media:ERR Comments1.png | ERR Committee comments to response 1]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Response 2 === | ||
+ | # MWPC Efficiency | ||
+ | #* [https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0050/005079/003/HallD_CPP_NPP_ERR_response2.pdf Response to parts A, B and C] | ||
+ | # Schedule Status | ||
+ | #* [[Media:CPP-NPP schedule status2.png | CPP-NPP Schedule Status 5/11/2021]]. The following two references show that the new hdgeant4 simulation is operational and working: | ||
+ | #* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3876633 Log Entry 3876633] Histogram of muon hits from hdgeant4 simulation. | ||
+ | #* [[Tracking / extrapolation to MWPCs]] Preliminary studies of extrapolation of FDC tracks to MWPCs | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Comments to Response 2 === | ||
+ | * [[Media:ERR Comments2.png | ERR Committee comments to response 2]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Response 3 === | ||
+ | We have summarized the preliminary results from the cosmic-ray test in EEL126 in [https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0053/005373/002/MWPC_production_testing.pdf '''Production Testing of MWPCs for CPP''' (GlueX-doc-5373)]. The CPP experiment requires six MWPCs and we have six chambers that deliver excellent performance in the cosmic-ray setup in the EEL. The estimates of the efficiency are of the order of 99.7% or greater over a broad range of voltage and/or software thresholds. Two spare MWPCs (Frodo and Galadriel) exhibit low levels of electronic noise that is under investigation. | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | #* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3940051 Efficiency summary for Arwen and Denethor (retest)] | ||
+ | #* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3932878 Efficiency summaries for all chambers] | ||
+ | #* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3937367 Arwen R188 analysis and voltage scan] | ||
+ | #* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3929607 Bilbo R166 and Celeborn R169 analysis] | ||
+ | #* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3936817 Denethor analysis R184] | ||
+ | #* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3932758 Eowyn analysis R171] | ||
+ | #* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3932293 Frodo analysis R175] | ||
+ | #* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3922895 Galadriel analysis R157] | ||
+ | #* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3922927 Haldor analysis R159] | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Comments to Response 3 (Approval) === | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[Media:ERR Approval.png | Email from Patrizia]]: The main points are summarized in the next two points. | ||
+ | * "...the committee is satisfied with the results of the MWPC tests and therefore they think the CPP/NPP collaboration fulfilled the requirements to pass the ERR." | ||
+ | * The committee encourages us to measure the performance in Hall D: "...the noise level can be different in the hall and therefore the threshold settings that will affect the efficiency. A test of chambers in the hall before the run is advised." | ||
== Additions to Standard Equipment == | == Additions to Standard Equipment == | ||
Line 33: | Line 84: | ||
* New (mono-isotopic) solid Pb target | * New (mono-isotopic) solid Pb target | ||
* Charged-particle trigger based on the time-of-flight detectors | * Charged-particle trigger based on the time-of-flight detectors | ||
− | + | * Move tagger microscope to cover 6 GeV coherent peak | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | * | + | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
== Documentation for Review == | == Documentation for Review == | ||
− | # [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc- | + | # PAC Documents |
− | # [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc- | + | #* [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-public/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4670 CPP Jeopardy Presentation PAC 48] September 24, 2020 |
− | # | + | #* [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-public/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4527 CPP Jeopardy Update PAC 48] June 22, 2020 |
− | #* | + | #* [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-public/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4600 NPP Presentation to PAC 48] August 13, 2020 |
− | #* | + | # TOF Trigger |
− | #* | + | #* [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-public/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4796 TOF trigger rate study with the upgraded TOF detector and optional lead shielding] |
− | #* | + | #* [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-public/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4889 TOF trigger pattern for CPP experiment] |
− | # | + | # Draft Documents |
− | # | + | #* [https://userweb.jlab.org/~elton/ERR-CPP-NPP_docs/3210T1Form_THA_CPP.doc THA MWPC] |
− | # | + | #* [https://userweb.jlab.org/~elton/ERR-CPP-NPP_docs/3210T1Form_THA_FCAL_Dark_Room.doc THA FCAL Dark Room] |
+ | #* [https://userweb.jlab.org/~elton/ERR-CPP-NPP_docs/3310T1Form_OSP_CPP.doc OSP for MWPC] | ||
+ | #* [https://userweb.jlab.org/~elton/ERR-CPP-NPP_docs/COO.pdf COO] | ||
+ | #* [https://userweb.jlab.org/~elton/ERR-CPP-NPP_docs/HallD_ERG.pdf ERG] | ||
+ | #* [https://userweb.jlab.org/~elton/ERR-CPP-NPP_docs/HallD_ESAD.pdf ESAD], [https://userweb.jlab.org/~elton/ERR-CPP-NPP_docs/HallD_ESAD_mod.pdf ESAD version with muon detector] | ||
+ | #* [https://userweb.jlab.org/~elton/ERR-CPP-NPP_docs/Draft_HallD_RSAD.pdf RSAD] | ||
+ | #* [https://userweb.jlab.org/~elton/ERR-CPP-NPP_docs/D00000-01-06-P006_RevB.docx FCAL Dark Room Procedure] | ||
+ | # [https://userweb.jlab.org/~elton/ERR-CPP-NPP_docs/Released_drawings Released Drawings] | ||
+ | # [https://userweb.jlab.org/~elton/ERR-CPP-NPP_docs/Released_drawings/HallD_CPP_Schedule.pdf Installation Schedule] | ||
+ | # Wiki Pages for further reference | ||
+ | #* [[Charged Pion Polarizability Experiment in Hall-D | CPP wiki page]] | ||
+ | #* [[Pi0 Polarizability | NPP wiki page]] |
Latest revision as of 08:56, 16 December 2021
Preparations for the CPP and NPP Readiness Review
- Goal: Complete Readiness Review in time to schedule experiment in 2022
- Media:Coarse Acc Schedule 2021.pdf
Contents
Planning for Experiment
Outline Presentations (February 10, 2021)
- https://bluejeans.com/195964581 Bluejeans connection for Open Session
- Reviewers:
- Stepan Stepanyan (chair+muon detector)
- Alexandre Cansonne (Trigger)
- Brad Sawatzky (Tracking System -MWPC)
- Chris Keith (Target)
- Robin Wines (Installation)
- Mikhail Kostin (RadCon)
- Edy Nissen (Beamline)
- Javier Gomez (Observer)
- Ed Folts (Observer)
- Agenda
- 08:15-08:45 Executive session
- 08:45-09:35 (30+20) Overview of Experiment and Setup (Charges: 1, 2. 5, 8) -- Rory Miskimen
- 09:35-10:25 (30+20) Engineering Design, Fabrication, Operation and Installation of CPP Hardware (Charges: 2, 3, 4) -- Tim Whitlatch
- 10:25-10:45 Coffee break
- 10:45-11:15 (20+10) Project implementation, resources and schedule (Charges: 3, 6, 7, 9) -- Elton Smith
- 11:15-14:30 Lunch and Executive Session
- 14:30 Closeout
Report and Response
Report
Response 1
- Point-by-point Response
- Timelines and Responsibilities
- Fabrication and Performance of the MWPC GlueX-doc-5080
Comments to Response 1
Response 2
- MWPC Efficiency
- Schedule Status
- CPP-NPP Schedule Status 5/11/2021. The following two references show that the new hdgeant4 simulation is operational and working:
- Log Entry 3876633 Histogram of muon hits from hdgeant4 simulation.
- Tracking / extrapolation to MWPCs Preliminary studies of extrapolation of FDC tracks to MWPCs
Comments to Response 2
Response 3
We have summarized the preliminary results from the cosmic-ray test in EEL126 in Production Testing of MWPCs for CPP (GlueX-doc-5373). The CPP experiment requires six MWPCs and we have six chambers that deliver excellent performance in the cosmic-ray setup in the EEL. The estimates of the efficiency are of the order of 99.7% or greater over a broad range of voltage and/or software thresholds. Two spare MWPCs (Frodo and Galadriel) exhibit low levels of electronic noise that is under investigation.
Comments to Response 3 (Approval)
- Email from Patrizia: The main points are summarized in the next two points.
- "...the committee is satisfied with the results of the MWPC tests and therefore they think the CPP/NPP collaboration fulfilled the requirements to pass the ERR."
- The committee encourages us to measure the performance in Hall D: "...the noise level can be different in the hall and therefore the threshold settings that will affect the efficiency. A test of chambers in the hall before the run is advised."
Additions to Standard Equipment
The major modifications required to operate the experiment are the following
- Design, fabrication and installation of the muon detector
- Multi-wire proportional chambers
- Modifications to the downstream platform, support structure and iron absorbers
- New (mono-isotopic) solid Pb target
- Charged-particle trigger based on the time-of-flight detectors
- Move tagger microscope to cover 6 GeV coherent peak
Documentation for Review
- PAC Documents
- CPP Jeopardy Presentation PAC 48 September 24, 2020
- CPP Jeopardy Update PAC 48 June 22, 2020
- NPP Presentation to PAC 48 August 13, 2020
- TOF Trigger
- Draft Documents
- Released Drawings
- Installation Schedule
- Wiki Pages for further reference