Difference between revisions of "Meeting 2022 01 13"
From GlueXWiki
(→Status of calibrations (all)) |
(→Status of calibrations (all)) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*[https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/0/0e/Sdobbs_srcct_20220111.pdf Summary] (Sean) | *[https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/0/0e/Sdobbs_srcct_20220111.pdf Summary] (Sean) | ||
** Runs with RF timing shifts: 90251, 90421, 90471, 90531 | ** Runs with RF timing shifts: 90251, 90421, 90471, 90531 | ||
− | |||
*[https://halldweb.jlab.org/SRC/production_2021/src_run_list_2021.xlsx Run summary and initial lumi estimates] (Sasha) | *[https://halldweb.jlab.org/SRC/production_2021/src_run_list_2021.xlsx Run summary and initial lumi estimates] (Sasha) | ||
− | *Status of PS (Tagger) calibration (Sasha) | + | * Status of PS (Tagger) calibration (Sasha) |
− | :: [https://halldweb.jlab.org/SRC/calibration/src_tagger_ps_calib_2021.xlsx PS calib status] | + | :: - [https://halldweb.jlab.org/SRC/meetings/ana_1_13_21 Timing offsets in TAGH/TAGM] |
+ | :: - [https://halldweb.jlab.org/SRC/calibration/src_tagger_ps_calib_2021.xlsx PS calib status] | ||
+ | * [[SRC FCAL time/energy calibrations]] (ig) | ||
+ | :: Current status [https://halldweb.jlab.org/primexd/src-he/InvariantMassFCAL_Pi0.pdf][https://halldweb.jlab.org/primexd/src-he/InvariantMassFCALzoom_Pi0.pdf][https://halldweb.jlab.org/primexd/src-he/MassResolutionFCAL_Pi0.pdf] | ||
+ | * Summary: calibrations ongoing, timeline is on the order of another month to complete. | ||
=== Status of data processing (Alexander) === | === Status of data processing (Alexander) === | ||
Line 23: | Line 26: | ||
* Analysis topics are listed [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aKzfkMVcBJAlpIWW3I3bj9odtR58qV5-xtXdd1Y6LwU/edit#gid=0 here] for discussion. | * Analysis topics are listed [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aKzfkMVcBJAlpIWW3I3bj9odtR58qV5-xtXdd1Y6LwU/edit#gid=0 here] for discussion. | ||
* Should decide on priorities and determine dependencies on various calibrations. | * Should decide on priorities and determine dependencies on various calibrations. | ||
+ | * students will review physics topics with their advisors and think about interest/feasibility in determining analysis question. | ||
+ | * all can look at the list and comment: quick analysis vs analysis that may lead to extension or have more impact for EIC physics. | ||
+ | * ex: t-dep of j/psi may be significant topic, but is it feasible? do we have enough data to say anything? | ||
=== Analysis updates (Bo, Phoebe, Bhesha, Jackson, ...) === | === Analysis updates (Bo, Phoebe, Bhesha, Jackson, ...) === | ||
* | * |
Latest revision as of 16:26, 13 January 2022
Hall D SRC/CT Analysis Meetings: THURSDAY 1:00pm - 2:30pm
Link to all previous meetings: Hall D SRC/CT Weekly Analysis Meetings
Please use halld_src mailing list for plots/communications!
Contents
Status of calibrations (all)
- Calibration flowchart (Phoebe -> Jackson)
- Summary (Sean)
- Runs with RF timing shifts: 90251, 90421, 90471, 90531
- Run summary and initial lumi estimates (Sasha)
- Status of PS (Tagger) calibration (Sasha)
- Summary: calibrations ongoing, timeline is on the order of another month to complete.
Status of data processing (Alexander)
- completed the monitoring launch over the 2021-11 SRC/CT data set, processing the first 40 files of each run deemed physics quality, selected with the RCDB query: daq_run=='PHYSICS_SRC', beam_current > 10, event_count > 5000000, solenoid_current > 100 and collimator_diameter != 'Blocking' (aka "@is_src_production")
- The merged histogram files can be found on the work disk at: /work/halld/data_monitoring/RunPeriod-2021-11/mon_ver02/rootfiles/
- The REST files, random trigger skims and several trees are saved on cache: /cache/halld/offline_monitoring/RunPeriod-2021-11/ver02/REST/
Analysis topics (Jackson)
- Analysis topics are listed here for discussion.
- Should decide on priorities and determine dependencies on various calibrations.
- students will review physics topics with their advisors and think about interest/feasibility in determining analysis question.
- all can look at the list and comment: quick analysis vs analysis that may lead to extension or have more impact for EIC physics.
- ex: t-dep of j/psi may be significant topic, but is it feasible? do we have enough data to say anything?