Difference between revisions of "BLTWG Meeting 3/20/2008"
From GlueXWiki
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
# Beamline issues emerging from discussions at PHP | # Beamline issues emerging from discussions at PHP | ||
# Answer from Glasgow regarding terms of use for diamonds | # Answer from Glasgow regarding terms of use for diamonds | ||
+ | # News from Jlab regarding sharing fragments of the 20micron Hall B diamond with Chess collaborators | ||
+ | # Problems reconciling the two orthogonal rocking curves from Nov 2008 X-ray data | ||
+ | # Argument by Yang for why type-I diamonds may be a poor choice for thinning because of the way the impurities affect the lattice. | ||
# Review of progress on updating Glasgow tagger drawings as starting point for 60% design work at Jlab. | # Review of progress on updating Glasgow tagger drawings as starting point for 60% design work at Jlab. | ||
# Review of progress on [[Photon Beam Design Requirements|subsystem specifications]] | # Review of progress on [[Photon Beam Design Requirements|subsystem specifications]] | ||
# Update on communications with YERPHI colleagues | # Update on communications with YERPHI colleagues |
Latest revision as of 11:17, 20 March 2008
- Time: 10:00 EST
- Place: EVO and ESNET
- Present:
Agenda
- Summary of what we learned at the PHP meeting
- Beamline issues emerging from discussions at PHP
- Answer from Glasgow regarding terms of use for diamonds
- News from Jlab regarding sharing fragments of the 20micron Hall B diamond with Chess collaborators
- Problems reconciling the two orthogonal rocking curves from Nov 2008 X-ray data
- Argument by Yang for why type-I diamonds may be a poor choice for thinning because of the way the impurities affect the lattice.
- Review of progress on updating Glasgow tagger drawings as starting point for 60% design work at Jlab.
- Review of progress on subsystem specifications
- Update on communications with YERPHI colleagues