Difference between revisions of "CDC algo tuning"
From GlueXWiki
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Ideas | Ideas | ||
#Check whether interpolating threshold xings makes any difference | #Check whether interpolating threshold xings makes any difference | ||
− | # | + | #Use the 3rd sample (or mean of 3rd & 4th samples) before hit threshold as local pedestal |
− | + | ||
#Try reverting to one threshold crossing instead of the extrapolation | #Try reverting to one threshold crossing instead of the extrapolation | ||
− | #Try something easier for event pedestal | + | #Try something easier for event pedestal - mean of 4 samples immediately before trigger |
Revision as of 17:59, 4 December 2013
Using prototype data from CDC_50_50 (run 31924) with offline analysis
50/50 Ar/CO2 and cosmics, 2100V, prototype horizontal
Original code, many samples upsampled
- Event pedestal is mean of 100 samples ending at trigger time
- Find hit threshold crossing
- Step back <pedlead> points to find new pedestal
- Search forward to find high threshold crossing
- Search backward to find low threshold crossing
- Project through both thresholds to find pedestal crossing time
Fewer samples upsampled
- Event pedestal is mean of 100 samples ending at trigger time
- Find hit threshold crossing
- Upsample region around threshold crossing, with threshold crossing sample in set position
- Step back <pedlead> points to find new pedestal
- Search forward to find high threshold crossing
- Search backward to find low threshold crossing
- Project through both thresholds to find pedestal crossing time
Ideas
- Check whether interpolating threshold xings makes any difference
- Use the 3rd sample (or mean of 3rd & 4th samples) before hit threshold as local pedestal
- Try reverting to one threshold crossing instead of the extrapolation
- Try something easier for event pedestal - mean of 4 samples immediately before trigger