Difference between revisions of "2017-01 recon ver02 plans"
From GlueXWiki
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* improved TOF calibrations | * improved TOF calibrations | ||
** use of ADC amplitude instead of integral | ** use of ADC amplitude instead of integral | ||
| − | * new SC attenuation length corrections | + | * <strike> new SC attenuation length corrections </strike> |
* BCAL charged track clusterizer | * BCAL charged track clusterizer | ||
* FCAL updates | * FCAL updates | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
** Update geometry? | ** Update geometry? | ||
* updated charged/neutral error matrices? | * updated charged/neutral error matrices? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Outstanding questions: | ||
| + | # What is the bump in BCAL & FCAL monitoring delta T distributions at +4 ns? | ||
| + | # What is the bump in SC monitoring delta T distributions at ~ -8 ns? | ||
| + | # What is the inefficiency in the TOF matching efficiency near the beam hole due to? | ||
Revision as of 17:28, 19 September 2017
These improvements are expected to go into the next round of reconstructed data:
- improved CDC dE/dx calculation
- use of ADC amplitude instead of integral - dE/dx vs theta
- updated truncation value
- improved TOF calibrations
- use of ADC amplitude instead of integral
-
new SC attenuation length corrections - BCAL charged track clusterizer
- FCAL updates
- Updated gains (fix problems with inner rings)
- Updated timing (fix high-rate running problem)
- Update geometry?
- updated charged/neutral error matrices?
Outstanding questions:
- What is the bump in BCAL & FCAL monitoring delta T distributions at +4 ns?
- What is the bump in SC monitoring delta T distributions at ~ -8 ns?
- What is the inefficiency in the TOF matching efficiency near the beam hole due to?
