Difference between revisions of "Meeting-3-22-2018"
From GlueXWiki
(Created page with "March 8, 2018 Drift Chamber meeting = Connection = # [https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Connect_to_Bluejeans_Meetings Instructions for Bluejeans meeting connection] #...") |
(→Agenda) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
# CDC settings for the rest of the run | # CDC settings for the rest of the run | ||
+ | ## Results from the CDC threshold scan run 41611 to 41614 (CDC hardware threshold 90, 110, 120, 140) | ||
+ | ### normalized rho yields at TH=120 increase by 4.3%, at TH=140 increase by 5.8%. Since these are different runs the data was normalized to the PS-flux | ||
+ | ### the rho yields seem to scale linearly with CDC hardware threshold. | ||
+ | ### CDC software threshold scan using run 41611 with hardware threshold at 90. First 3 files of the run are analyzed, same data so no normalization necessary. At 110 a rho yield increase of 3.3% is seen, at 140 a rho yield increase of 3.7% is seen, at 150 a rho yield increase of 3.4% is seen, at 160 a rho yield increase of 2.7% is seen. | ||
+ | ### the rho yields do not scale linearly with software threshold! They saturate at about 140 (same as the highest hardware threshold) | ||
+ | ### the software threshold of 140 leads to a rho yield increase of 3.7% while the hardware threshold of 140 to about 5.8%, this may be an indication that there is some shadowing effect. | ||
+ | ### run 41614 with hardware threshold at 140, an increase of the software threshold from 150 to 160 does not increase the rho yield at a measurable level. | ||
+ | ### see logbook entry: https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3544993 | ||
# Other | # Other | ||
Revision as of 08:07, 22 March 2018
March 8, 2018 Drift Chamber meeting
Connection
- Instructions for Bluejeans meeting connection
- Meeting ID: 290664653
Headline text
- To join via a Web Browser, go to the page [1] https://bluejeans.com/290664653.
Agenda
- CDC settings for the rest of the run
- Results from the CDC threshold scan run 41611 to 41614 (CDC hardware threshold 90, 110, 120, 140)
- normalized rho yields at TH=120 increase by 4.3%, at TH=140 increase by 5.8%. Since these are different runs the data was normalized to the PS-flux
- the rho yields seem to scale linearly with CDC hardware threshold.
- CDC software threshold scan using run 41611 with hardware threshold at 90. First 3 files of the run are analyzed, same data so no normalization necessary. At 110 a rho yield increase of 3.3% is seen, at 140 a rho yield increase of 3.7% is seen, at 150 a rho yield increase of 3.4% is seen, at 160 a rho yield increase of 2.7% is seen.
- the rho yields do not scale linearly with software threshold! They saturate at about 140 (same as the highest hardware threshold)
- the software threshold of 140 leads to a rho yield increase of 3.7% while the hardware threshold of 140 to about 5.8%, this may be an indication that there is some shadowing effect.
- run 41614 with hardware threshold at 140, an increase of the software threshold from 150 to 160 does not increase the rho yield at a measurable level.
- see logbook entry: https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3544993
- Results from the CDC threshold scan run 41611 to 41614 (CDC hardware threshold 90, 110, 120, 140)
- Other