JEF meeting, May 6. 2022
From GlueXWiki
meeting time and location
- 9:30 am EST (JLab time) remote only
- Zoom meeting ID: 161 050 9142 Passcode: 004965
Agenda
- Preparation for mass production of FCAL2 modules -- Sasha
- Status of Summer Students (2022)
- Hotels summer 2022
- DSG:
- 904 SICCAS foils preshaped (finished) ! Started preshaping Crytur foils (16 done)
- Wrapping: 30 crystals during this week
- Chris A. continues to braze starps (have right now about 40 assemblies)
- Igal cut Tedlar, Kapton, and ESR
- Production of Silicon cookies (Olga)
- New clean room EEL 108 [3][4]
- Submitted OSP to amend location
- Module fabrication -- Sasha
- Light Monitoring System -- Arshak
- Data analysis
- Simulations
- Workshops/external meetings
- DNP 2022 fall meeting: DNP 2022 web site
- Proposed ECT* (https://www.ectstar.eu/) workshop
Minutes
Attendees: Axel, Bill, Sasha, Igal, Liping, Tegan, Arshak, Olga, Zisis, Tim B., Phil, Jane, S.T.
- We had some discussion regarding lodging for students coming to the lab in the summer.
- Several hotels and extended-stay places/apartments have been identified by Olga for the period when the ResFac is not available
- Arrival dates and stay duration have been set for GWU/NOVA students + 1 from UNCW and 1 from Lamar.
- Module fabrication continues with help from Olga this week; now up to 373!
- New space in the EEL building has been fenced off
- Sasha still working on updated OSP
- Arshak gave an update on the LMS development
- Machine shop has cut hole in new plexiglas sheet for the LMS
- Edges of sheet need some polishing to get rid of some scratches
- Laser light shines all the way through from one side of the sheet to the other -- much better than previous prototype
- Fibers with connectors have been constructed using UV-curing glue
- Igal, Drew S., and S.T. met with Ilya to discuss details of the implementation of the island algorithm for the CCAL
- S.T. has been adapting this algorithm for use with FCAL-2
- Identified a part of the CCAL code that may not be necessary to use
- Some indication from Tegan that Log-weighting for the position not as good as energy weighting
- Shower reconstruction efficiencies need to be understood better