Difference between revisions of "CDC signal integration new"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Cosmics, 50/50 gas, 2090V
 
Cosmics, 50/50 gas, 2090V
  
Comparison with old (underpowered pream) data is at [[CDC_signal_integration]]
+
Comparison with old (underpowered preamp) data is at [[CDC_signal_integration]]
  
  
 
Run numbers are 31809 (horiz) 31810 (45 deg) and 31811 (30 deg) at 3.0V, 2.09kV
 
Run numbers are 31809 (horiz) 31810 (45 deg) and 31811 (30 deg) at 3.0V, 2.09kV
  
 
+
[[#dEdx_attempts]]
  
 
{| border="0" cellpadding="2"  
 
{| border="0" cellpadding="2"  
Line 40: Line 40:
 
Data below are for hit threshold 5 x pedestal sigma  
 
Data below are for hit threshold 5 x pedestal sigma  
  
<div style="background-color:#fcf">
+
<div style="background-color:#fcf" id="dEdx_attempts">
 
Try to calculate dE/dx by dividing by track length (calculated in the plane parallel to the endplates)...
 
Try to calculate dE/dx by dividing by track length (calculated in the plane parallel to the endplates)...
 
(A) integrate signal for 700 ns  (B) position of first max in amplitude (C) integrate signal up to position of first max in amplitude
 
(A) integrate signal for 700 ns  (B) position of first max in amplitude (C) integrate signal up to position of first max in amplitude

Revision as of 19:08, 9 July 2012

Cosmics, 50/50 gas, 2090V

Comparison with old (underpowered preamp) data is at CDC_signal_integration


Run numbers are 31809 (horiz) 31810 (45 deg) and 31811 (30 deg) at 3.0V, 2.09kV

#dEdx_attempts

Pedestal height
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
30 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Pedestal width (std dev of first 100 samples in each event)
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
30 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Histograms of first max in signal amplitude with hit threshold 4 x pedestal sigma
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
30 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Histograms of first max in signal amplitude with hit threshold 5 x pedestal sigma
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
30 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V

Ratio of fit MPV for horizontal : 30 degr : 45 degr data are 210 : 261 : 317 or 1 : 1.24 : 1.51 Ratio of vertical path lengths should be 1 : 1.15 : 1.41 or 1 : 1.16 : 1.45 after correcting for range of angles due to scintillator height and width.

Data below are for hit threshold 5 x pedestal sigma

Try to calculate dE/dx by dividing by track length (calculated in the plane parallel to the endplates)... (A) integrate signal for 700 ns (B) position of first max in amplitude (C) integrate signal up to position of first max in amplitude

(A) integration from low threshold crossing for next 700ns / track length
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 30 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
(B) height of first maximum in signal amplitude / track length
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 30 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V

Ratio of fit MPV for horizontal : 30 degr : 45 degr data are 16.9 : 21.4 : 25.7 or 1 : 1.27 : 1.52 Ratio of vertical path lengths should be 1 : 1.16 : 1.45

(C) signal integrated from low threshold crossing to position of first maximum in signal amplitude / track length
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 30 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V

Ratio of fit MPV for horizontal : 30 degr : 45 degr data are 40.7 : 54.5 : 69.2 or 1 : 1.34 : 1.70

(Purple background section has histograms from previous section with the tilted data scaled by 1/cos(tilt angle))

Track length is calculated in the plane parallel to the endplates (no z information) so I scaled it by the tilt of the prototype for the 45 degree data, the upper cosmic trigger scintillator is high up enough that the cosmics are ~ vertical.

(A) integration from low threshold crossing for next 700ns / track length (scaled for tilt angle)
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 30 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V

The ratio of tilted 45deg to horizontal integration means is 1.24 (old data) and 1.28 (new data); it should be 1 (as they are already scaled by track length) so this means the tilted integrations are 25-30% too large.


(B) height of first maximum in signal amplitude / track length (scaled for tilt angle)
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 30 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V

The ratio of tilted 45deg to horizontal MPV of Landau fitted to amplitude/track length histogram is 0.99 (old data) and 1.07 (new data).


(C) signal integrated from low threshold crossing to position of first maximum in signal amplitude / track length (scaled for tilt angle)
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 30 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V

The ratio of tilted 45deg to horizontal MPV of Landau fitted to (integration to first maximum/tracklength) histogram is 1.07 (old data) and 1.18 (new data).


Look at time over threshold...

Peak duration is # samples after the lower threshold crossing until the ADC value decreases by 2sigma over 2 samples, this is a measure of time over threshold in units of 8ns


Peak duration
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V


Peak duration / track length
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Peak duration vs track length
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Amplitude (first max) vs track length
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Peak length vs first maximum in signal amplitude
No tilt, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V
Tilted at 45 degrees, LV 3.0V, HV 2090V