Difference between revisions of "GlueX PAC 2010"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Written Material for the PAC)
(Outline of Material)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
We are allowed a <font color="green">10 page</font> long update to the proposal that was presented in 2006. In discussions with Larry Cardman, he saw our main purpose being to re-affirm the physics case for GlueX, and then describe what has happened in the filed since our proposal. The following outline has a rough page count for this.
 
We are allowed a <font color="green">10 page</font> long update to the proposal that was presented in 2006. In discussions with Larry Cardman, he saw our main purpose being to re-affirm the physics case for GlueX, and then describe what has happened in the filed since our proposal. The following outline has a rough page count for this.
 
It may turn out that we need more for the physics part.
 
It may turn out that we need more for the physics part.
# Introduction <font color="green">(~1/2 page)</font>
+
# Introduction <font color="green">(~0.5 page)</font>
# Progress in the field of spectroscopy. <font color="green">(~4 pages)</font>
+
# Meson Spectroscopy and the Search for QCD Exotics.<font color="green">(~1.75 pages)</font>
## Updates on theoretical (lattice) work.
+
# Meson Spectroscopy and Lattice QCD.<font color="green">(1.75 pages)</font>
## Updates on the experimental front.
+
# GlueX Data Analysis. <font color="green">(~0.75 pages)</font>
# Progress on Analysis for GlueX <font color="green">(~2 pages)</font>
+
# GlueX Amplitude Analysis. <font color="green">(~1.25 pages)</font>
## Presentation of a PWA with GlueX software.
+
# Updates to the GlueX Equipment. <font color="green">(~1.5 pages)</font>  
## Progress on PWA theory and implementation.
+
# Other Physics with GlueX. <font color="green">(0.5 pages)</font>
# Updates to the experimental Setup. <font color="green">(~3 pages)</font>  
+
# Summary. <font color="green">(~0.5 pages)</font>
## The CD2/CD3 reviews.
+
# References. <font color="green">(~0.5 pages)</font>
## Changes to the detector.
+
## Status of construction.
+
# Other Physics with GlueX <font color="green">(1/2 page)</font>
+
## Cascade Baryons
+
## PrimEx
+
## others
+
  
 
== Slides Presented to the PAC ==
 
== Slides Presented to the PAC ==

Revision as of 15:28, 22 June 2010

PAC36 Meeting

The PAC36 will take place during the week of August 23, 2010.

Charge Information

Continuing the process of setting the scientific priorities and beam allocations for currently approved (and conditionally approved) 12 GeV proposals. See the full charge here.

Written Material for the PAC

  1. The GlueX Experiment in Hall-D Draft Version 1.0 - 10 June, 2010.
  2. Comments
  3. Schedule to delivery of material to Jefferson Lab
    1. Saturday June 19 -- Draft out for comments.
    2. Thursday June 24 -- Updated version of the material
    3. Tuesday June 29 -- Final draft for last read-through.
    4. Thursday July 1--Material sent to Larry Cardman

Outline of Material

We are allowed a 10 page long update to the proposal that was presented in 2006. In discussions with Larry Cardman, he saw our main purpose being to re-affirm the physics case for GlueX, and then describe what has happened in the filed since our proposal. The following outline has a rough page count for this. It may turn out that we need more for the physics part.

  1. Introduction (~0.5 page)
  2. Meson Spectroscopy and the Search for QCD Exotics.(~1.75 pages)
  3. Meson Spectroscopy and Lattice QCD.(1.75 pages)
  4. GlueX Data Analysis. (~0.75 pages)
  5. GlueX Amplitude Analysis. (~1.25 pages)
  6. Updates to the GlueX Equipment. (~1.5 pages)
  7. Other Physics with GlueX. (0.5 pages)
  8. Summary. (~0.5 pages)
  9. References. (~0.5 pages)

Slides Presented to the PAC

We are allowed to present three slides (presentation made by Curtis) to the PAC on GlueX. These slides are to contain the following.

  • Slide 1: Summarize the scientific case for the experiment.
  • Slide 2: Summarize the data anticipated and its projected accuracy.
  • Slide 3: Anything else the collaboration would like to add that they feel is relevant.

Reference Material