Difference between revisions of "GlueX TOF Meeting, January 29, 2020"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(adjusted)
 
m (Calibration)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Wednesday, January 29, 2020<br>
 
Wednesday, January 29, 2020<br>
 
10:00 am EST<br>
 
10:00 am EST<br>
JLab: CEBAF Center, Room ????<br>
+
JLab: TEDF, Room 2561b<br>
 
BlueJeans: [http://bluejeans.com/350531998 350 531 998]
 
BlueJeans: [http://bluejeans.com/350531998 350 531 998]
  
Line 13: Line 13:
 
# TOF NIM paper
 
# TOF NIM paper
 
# Action Item Recap
 
# Action Item Recap
 +
 +
== Minutes ==
 +
 +
Present:
 +
 +
* ''' FSU: ''' Edmundo Barriga
 +
* ''' JLab: ''' Mark Ito, Sasha Ostrovidov, Beni Zihlmann
 +
 +
=== Calibration ===
 +
 +
Beni reported on the calibration of the current run.
 +
 +
* The code works now with the new geometry.
 +
* He has gone through the steps of the procedure multiple times.
 +
* There still may be some checks to do on the code.
 +
* The walk correction is key: without a good walk correction subsequent steps are useless.
 +
* A reconstruction job using the new constants was tried. Pions greater than 1.0 GeV/c are required to match TOF points to within 13 cm in x and y. Many histograms are empty, some only partially filled. This is work in progress.
 +
 +
=== NIM Paper ===
 +
 +
Sasha reports that work continues on the NIM paper, though not at a blazing fast pace. Further discussion is needed.

Latest revision as of 11:44, 4 February 2020

GlueX Time-of-Flight Meeting
Wednesday, January 29, 2020
10:00 am EST
JLab: TEDF, Room 2561b
BlueJeans: 350 531 998

Agenda

  1. Announcements
  2. Review of minutes from the last meeting
  3. Detector Status
  4. Software Issues
  5. TOF NIM paper
  6. Action Item Recap

Minutes

Present:

  • FSU: Edmundo Barriga
  • JLab: Mark Ito, Sasha Ostrovidov, Beni Zihlmann

Calibration

Beni reported on the calibration of the current run.

  • The code works now with the new geometry.
  • He has gone through the steps of the procedure multiple times.
  • There still may be some checks to do on the code.
  • The walk correction is key: without a good walk correction subsequent steps are useless.
  • A reconstruction job using the new constants was tried. Pions greater than 1.0 GeV/c are required to match TOF points to within 13 cm in x and y. Many histograms are empty, some only partially filled. This is work in progress.

NIM Paper

Sasha reports that work continues on the NIM paper, though not at a blazing fast pace. Further discussion is needed.