Difference between revisions of "Minutes-8-13-2015"
m (Text replacement - "http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/cgi-bin/private" to "https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private") |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
= Agenda = | = Agenda = | ||
| − | # Detector performance document [ | + | # Detector performance document [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=2775 GlueX-doc-2775] |
# CDC update (Mike, Simon, Beni) | # CDC update (Mike, Simon, Beni) | ||
#* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3347749 wire offsets vs z (logbook entry)] | #* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3347749 wire offsets vs z (logbook entry)] | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
#* Tagger Tests with Fe source: [http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/luke/2250_XvsRatio.pdf][http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/luke/2250_XvsRatioPY.pdf][http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/luke/Tag_RatioTGraph.pdf][http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/luke/Tag_XpeakTGraph.pdf] | #* Tagger Tests with Fe source: [http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/luke/2250_XvsRatio.pdf][http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/luke/2250_XvsRatioPY.pdf][http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/luke/Tag_RatioTGraph.pdf][http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/luke/Tag_XpeakTGraph.pdf] | ||
# Electronics (Fernando, Chris, Nick) | # Electronics (Fernando, Chris, Nick) | ||
| − | #* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3347746 separating broken wire] | + | #* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3347746 separating broken CDC wire] |
# Engineering | # Engineering | ||
# Other | # Other | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
= Minutes = | = Minutes = | ||
| Line 31: | Line 29: | ||
== CDC update == | == CDC update == | ||
| − | - Simon studied the wire offset as function of z (along wire) using beam data. In the logbook entry linked above, the two plots show the offsets for a straw at 9 o'clock when the track is above/below the wire. The offset variations are consistent with up/down deformation, possibly sagging of the tube or wire. Curtis, Naomi: if supported at the ends only the tubes will sag by few mm, but after gluing them together there was no sagging. | + | - Simon studied the wire offset as function of z (along wire) using beam data. In the logbook entry linked above, the two plots show the offsets for a straw at 9 o'clock when the track is above/below the wire. The offset variations are consistent with up/down deformation, possibly sagging of the tube or wire. To confirm this, need to look also at straws at 12/6 o'clock. Curtis, Naomi: if supported at the ends only, the tubes will sag by few mm, but after gluing them together there was no sagging. |
| − | - Cosmic data will | + | - Cosmic data will be taken over the weekend with mode 7. |
== Electronics == | == Electronics == | ||
| − | - | + | - Nick showed pictures (logbook entry linked above) demonstrating the separation of the CDC broken wire. |
== FDC update == | == FDC update == | ||
| − | - | + | - Luke reported about the studies with 55Fe source with the spare package (plots attached). One can reconstruct the avalanche position in 2D: using up/down cathode charge ratio for position in direction perpendicular to the chamber and for the left/right position w.r.t. wire using the crossing of the centroid positions on the two cathodes. After fine calibration of the cathode channels one can see a hole where the wire is. Luke fitted the maximums at the two sides of the wire, first, in up/down direction and then left/right from the wire. The up/down maximum positions vary with the charge as demonstrated for two gas mixtures, 60/40 and 40/60 Ar/CO2. The left/right maximums are almost constants. The only explanation so far is related to the contributions from the ion tails that somehow vary with the charge. |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Latest revision as of 17:12, 24 February 2017
August 13, 2015 Drift Chamber meeting
Contents
Connection
- Instructions for Bluejeans meeting connection
- Meeting ID: 290664653
- To join via a Web Browser, go to the page [1] https://bluejeans.com/290664653.
Agenda
- Detector performance document GlueX-doc-2775
- CDC update (Mike, Simon, Beni)
- FDC update (Luke,Lubomir)
- Electronics (Fernando, Chris, Nick)
- Engineering
- Other
Minutes
Participants: Curtis, Naomi, Mike (CMU), Luke, Beni, Dave, Chris, Nick, Simon, Sergey and Lubomir (JLab).
Detector performance document
- Curtis is working on a document describing the so-far achieved detector parameters compared with the design goals. Lubomir will add a page about the FDC.
CDC update
- Simon studied the wire offset as function of z (along wire) using beam data. In the logbook entry linked above, the two plots show the offsets for a straw at 9 o'clock when the track is above/below the wire. The offset variations are consistent with up/down deformation, possibly sagging of the tube or wire. To confirm this, need to look also at straws at 12/6 o'clock. Curtis, Naomi: if supported at the ends only, the tubes will sag by few mm, but after gluing them together there was no sagging.
- Cosmic data will be taken over the weekend with mode 7.
Electronics
- Nick showed pictures (logbook entry linked above) demonstrating the separation of the CDC broken wire.
FDC update
- Luke reported about the studies with 55Fe source with the spare package (plots attached). One can reconstruct the avalanche position in 2D: using up/down cathode charge ratio for position in direction perpendicular to the chamber and for the left/right position w.r.t. wire using the crossing of the centroid positions on the two cathodes. After fine calibration of the cathode channels one can see a hole where the wire is. Luke fitted the maximums at the two sides of the wire, first, in up/down direction and then left/right from the wire. The up/down maximum positions vary with the charge as demonstrated for two gas mixtures, 60/40 and 40/60 Ar/CO2. The left/right maximums are almost constants. The only explanation so far is related to the contributions from the ion tails that somehow vary with the charge.
