Difference between revisions of "Monitoring System Requirements"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
| Variation in arrival times of cal pulses || align=center | ~3 ns || align=center | ≤ 2 ns || align=center | ~3ns || align=center  | ~3ns  
 
| Variation in arrival times of cal pulses || align=center | ~3 ns || align=center | ≤ 2 ns || align=center | ~3ns || align=center  | ~3ns  
 
|-  
 
|-  
| Time stability gain and timing (one channel) || || ≤ 10% in 6 months || ||
+
| Time stability gain and timing (one channel) || || ≤ 10% in 6 months
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
| Temperature stability (likely cause of time stability) || || 1<sup>o</sup> causes 3% gain change|| ||
 
| Temperature stability (likely cause of time stability) || || 1<sup>o</sup> causes 3% gain change|| ||
 
|-  
 
|-  
| Location of calibration input ||From front to monitor rad damage || light guide tapered side || ||
+
| Location of calibration input ||From front to monitor rad damage || light guide tapered side
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
| Geometrical constraints || Approximately 90% of front 4x4 cm2 area available || packing of WC and LGs, LED fitting, cable routing || ||  
 
| Geometrical constraints || Approximately 90% of front 4x4 cm2 area available || packing of WC and LGs, LED fitting, cable routing || ||  

Revision as of 17:49, 8 December 2010

DRAFT Table of Parameters and Requirements
Characteristic LED/fibre LED/wire
Dead/alive or on/off ≤ 15%
Dynamic range of input (number of photoelectrons) typically 100
Requirement on absolute light input none (PRIMEX might have) 150 pe on module
Variation in arrival times of cal pulses ~3 ns ≤ 2 ns ~3ns ~3ns
Time stability gain and timing (one channel) ≤ 10% in 6 months
Temperature stability (likely cause of time stability) 1o causes 3% gain change
Location of calibration input From front to monitor rad damage light guide tapered side
Geometrical constraints Approximately 90% of front 4x4 cm2 area available packing of WC and LGs, LED fitting, cable routing
  1. Comment: Time (and temperature) stability most important.
  2. Comment: Option of delivering a range of light intensities important (e.g. using various filter settings).
  3. Comment from Werner: The flexibility in the use of the LED would be very useful for the start counter. Christina: Still need to test stability.
  4. Questions to Matt: What uniformity could one expect from the plexiglass input system? How many fibers were used to pulse the plexiglass, i.e. how often were they spaced?
  5. Comment: Matt drew attention to an LED pulser by Paul Smith which might be a useful reference.