Difference between revisions of "Neutral Particle PID May 2007"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
m (Text replacement - "http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/gluex" to "https://halldweb.jlab.org")
 
(38 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
__NOTOC__
  
−
Please edit this page!  Write answers to the questions.  Add more questions.  Also please link any relevant technical document or talk to this page so we can use it as a resource during discussions.
+
'''''Please edit this page!  Write answers to the questions.  Add more questions.  Also please link any relevant technical document or talk to this page so we can use it as a resource during discussions.'''''
  
−
== Neutral Particle PID Questions ==
 
  
−
* What is needed to to develop a MC with realistic efficiency and resolution for neutrals?
+
* [[May 2007 PID Workshop]]
 +
** [[Physics Goals and Performance Metrics]]
 +
** [[Neutral Particle PID May 2007]]
 +
** [[Charged Particle PID May 2007]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Neutral Particle PID Questions ==
  
 +
*  What is needed to develop a MC with realistic efficiency and resolution for neutrals that includes appropriate backgrounds from photon conversions?
 
** appropriate detector/electronics response must be included in simulation
 
** appropriate detector/electronics response must be included in simulation
 
** an operational reconstruction algorithm must exist in the software framework
 
** an operational reconstruction algorithm must exist in the software framework
Line 12: Line 19:
 
== BCAL ==
 
== BCAL ==
  
−
=== Detector Response ===
+
=== Documentation/Talks/Links ===
  
−
* What input is needed to validate the detector response in the Monte Carlo?  (Richard/Zisis/George)
+
* status of simulation and reconstruction of photons (George/Zisis/Mihajlo)
−
* What is the status of the beam test analysis that can provide (some of) that input? (Blake/Zisis/George)
+
** Status Quo from 2005-6 work at Regina:
 +
*** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=569 Description of KLOE-> Regina code]
 +
*** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=659 Final Reconstruction Report]
 +
*** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=641 Presentation to April 2006 Collab Meeting - 2nd half]
 +
** [http://dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu/~mikornic/bcal.pdf Mihajlo's BCAL Figures]
 +
** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=795 Specifications and Evaluation of Bcal Readout Specs]
 +
* analysis of test beam data (Blake/George/Zisis)
 +
** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=804 Blake's Preliminary Timing Resolution Report]
 +
** [[BCAL Beam Tests 2006 - Analysis]]; shows progress in the analysis by Blake
 +
** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=819 BCAL Module 1 Specs]
 +
** [[BCAL Beam Tests]] - Hall-B, September 2006 (Master Wiki Page)
  
−
=== Reconstruction ===
+
=== Discussion Points ===
  
−
* What is the status of the reconstruct algorithm in the MC? (David/Zisis/Mihajlo)
+
==== Detector Response ====
  
−
=== Supporting Documentation/Links ===
+
* What input is needed to validate the detector response in the Monte Carlo?
 +
* What is the status of the beam test analysis that can provide (some of) that input?
  
−
== FCAL  ==
+
==== Reconstruction ====
  
−
=== Detector Response ===
+
* What is the status of the reconstruction algorithm in the MC?
 +
* What is the best method for tuning and improving this algorithm?
  
−
* How accurate is the detector response in the Monte Carlo?  (Richard/Mihajlo/Matt)
 
−
** it currently does not include photo-statistics, can/should this be improved
 
−
** will need tuning after beam test
 
  
−
=== Reconstruction ===
+
====Follow up====
 +
=====Walk Corrections =====
 +
[[Image:Bcal timewalk s7.gif|left|thumb|"s7"|100px]]
 +
[[Image:Bcal timewalk s8.gif|left|thumb|"s8"|100px]]
 +
[[Image:Bcal timewalk s9.gif|left|thumb|"s9"|100px]]
 +
[[Image:Bcal timewalk s10.gif|left|thumb|"s10"|100px]]
  
−
* What is the status of the reconstruction algorithm in the MC?
+
 
 +
<br style="clear:both;"/>
 +
 
 +
=====Sampling Fraction Resolution=====
 +
[[Image:Samfracres.gif|left|thumb|"sampling fraction resolution"|100px]]
 +
<br style="clear:both;"/>
  
 
== Material Budget ==
 
== Material Budget ==
 +
 +
=== Documentation/Talks/Links ===
 +
 +
* impact of FDC material on shower reconstruction/efficiency (Richard/Mihajlo)
 +
* impact of FDC material on backgrounds (Matt)
 +
** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0007/000783/001/BG_Rate_Mar-2007.pdf Matt's Mar-2007 Background Rate Talk]
 +
 +
=== Discussion Points ===
  
 
* Is the material picture accurate?
 
* Is the material picture accurate?
 
* Are we considering alternate material descriptions?
 
* Are we considering alternate material descriptions?
 
* What is the status of these investigations?
 
* What is the status of these investigations?
 +
 +
 +
== FCAL  ==
 +
 +
=== Documentation/Talks/Links ===
 +
 +
* status of simulation and reconstruction of photons (Mihajlo)
 +
** [http://dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu/~mashephe/fcal_recon_mk_07.pdf Mihajlo's Mar-2007 Talk (GlueX-doc 787)]
 +
** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0008/000823/001/clust_draft2.pdf FCAL photon reconstruction note]
 +
** [http://dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu/~mikornic/GlueX/fcal/ Mihajlo's FCAL Web Space]
 +
* quantifying improvements in light collection efficiency (Matt)
 +
** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0007/000782/001/FCAL_Mar-2007.pdf Matt's Mar-2007 FCAL Talk (GlueX-doc 782)]
 +
 +
=== Discussion Points ===
 +
 +
==== Detector Response ====
 +
 +
* How accurate is the detector response in the Monte Carlo?
 +
** it currently does not include photo-statistics, can/should this be improved?
 +
** response will need tuning after beam test
 +
 +
==== Reconstruction ====
 +
 +
* What is the status of the reconstruction algorithm in the MC?

Latest revision as of 12:39, 14 March 2017


Please edit this page! Write answers to the questions. Add more questions. Also please link any relevant technical document or talk to this page so we can use it as a resource during discussions.



Neutral Particle PID Questions

  • What is needed to develop a MC with realistic efficiency and resolution for neutrals that includes appropriate backgrounds from photon conversions?
    • appropriate detector/electronics response must be included in simulation
    • an operational reconstruction algorithm must exist in the software framework
    • simulation must include a realistic picture of the material in front of the calorimeters

BCAL

Documentation/Talks/Links

Discussion Points

Detector Response

  • What input is needed to validate the detector response in the Monte Carlo?
  • What is the status of the beam test analysis that can provide (some of) that input?

Reconstruction

  • What is the status of the reconstruction algorithm in the MC?
  • What is the best method for tuning and improving this algorithm?


Follow up

Walk Corrections
"s7"
"s8"
"s9"
"s10"



Sampling Fraction Resolution
"sampling fraction resolution"


Material Budget

Documentation/Talks/Links

Discussion Points

  • Is the material picture accurate?
  • Are we considering alternate material descriptions?
  • What is the status of these investigations?


FCAL

Documentation/Talks/Links

Discussion Points

Detector Response

  • How accurate is the detector response in the Monte Carlo?
    • it currently does not include photo-statistics, can/should this be improved?
    • response will need tuning after beam test

Reconstruction

  • What is the status of the reconstruction algorithm in the MC?
Retrieved from "https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=Neutral_Particle_PID_May_2007&oldid=81425"