Difference between revisions of "BCAL"
From GlueXWiki
(→Scintillation Fibers) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
** [[Fiber Tests at Regina | Fiber Tests at Regina]] | ** [[Fiber Tests at Regina | Fiber Tests at Regina]] | ||
| − | == Silicon PM == | + | ==Readout== |
| + | |||
| + | === Roadmap toward decisions === | ||
| + | #Technical specifications, already outlined in GlueX-doc-795 | ||
| + | #* SiPM tests are underway | ||
| + | #* Werner has recent results of tests of fine mesh PMTs | ||
| + | # Geometry, especially related to acceptance gap between Bcal and Fcal | ||
| + | #* Light guides and inactive material is different for the two options. We need to simulate the effect of each | ||
| + | #* Precise configuration of light guides for FM pmts on the upstream end, where the field at the end of the Bcal exceeds 0.5 T. | ||
| + | #* Detail description of cables and electronics on each detector | ||
| + | # Granularity. | ||
| + | #* Optimization of distribution between inner and outer detectors | ||
| + | #* Which detectors should have discriminators and TDCs | ||
| + | #* Study of signal splitting, choice of discriminator - has an impact on number of cables. | ||
| + | # Resolution | ||
| + | #* Complete simulation studies for correct thresholds for the FM. | ||
| + | #* Studies of timing resolution. Realistic simulation for both photons and charged particles | ||
| + | #* Resolution for various geometry options (mentioned above). | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Silicon PM === | ||
*[[Private:SensL SiPMs | SensL SiPMs]] | *[[Private:SensL SiPMs | SensL SiPMs]] | ||
| − | == Fine Mesh PMT == | + | === Fine Mesh PMT === |
*[[Alternative readout | Alternative readout]] | *[[Alternative readout | Alternative readout]] | ||
| − | == Light Guides == | + | === Light Guides === |
*[[Light Guide Collection | Light Guide Collection]] | *[[Light Guide Collection | Light Guide Collection]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Magnetic Field === | ||
| + | *[http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=912 Field at the location of pmts] | ||
== Beam tests == | == Beam tests == | ||
| Line 36: | Line 58: | ||
* [http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/gluex/DocDB/0008/000827/003/BCALsampfrac_note2.pdf Sampling Fraction Fluctuations GlueX-Doc 827-v3] | * [http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/gluex/DocDB/0008/000827/003/BCALsampfrac_note2.pdf Sampling Fraction Fluctuations GlueX-Doc 827-v3] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Electronics == | == Electronics == | ||
*[[Alberta CFDs]] | *[[Alberta CFDs]] | ||
| − | |||
= Action Item Tracker = | = Action Item Tracker = | ||
*[[Bcal Action Item Tracker]] | *[[Bcal Action Item Tracker]] | ||
Revision as of 14:47, 13 October 2008
Contents
Meetings
Ongoing Activities
Scintillation Fibers
- Documents
- Experimental Tests
Readout
Roadmap toward decisions
- Technical specifications, already outlined in GlueX-doc-795
- SiPM tests are underway
- Werner has recent results of tests of fine mesh PMTs
- Geometry, especially related to acceptance gap between Bcal and Fcal
- Light guides and inactive material is different for the two options. We need to simulate the effect of each
- Precise configuration of light guides for FM pmts on the upstream end, where the field at the end of the Bcal exceeds 0.5 T.
- Detail description of cables and electronics on each detector
- Granularity.
- Optimization of distribution between inner and outer detectors
- Which detectors should have discriminators and TDCs
- Study of signal splitting, choice of discriminator - has an impact on number of cables.
- Resolution
- Complete simulation studies for correct thresholds for the FM.
- Studies of timing resolution. Realistic simulation for both photons and charged particles
- Resolution for various geometry options (mentioned above).
Silicon PM
Fine Mesh PMT
Light Guides
Magnetic Field
Beam tests
Monte Carlo
- BCAL Stand-Alone Monte Carlo - energy resolution
- BCAL Low-Energy Photon Response
- Sampling Fraction Fluctuations GlueX-Doc 827-v3
Electronics
Action Item Tracker
Archives
GlueX-notes: 985, 986, 987 and 989 document the Barrel Calorimeter as per the February 2008 Calorimeter Review.
